x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Guidelines
- EditorialRemove Editorial filter
- Research ArticleRemove Research Article filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2013 and 2021.
Author
- Ad, Niv1
- Badhwar, Vinay1
- Brunelli, Alessandro1
- Calkins, Hugh1
- Criner, Gerard J1
- Damiano, Ralph J Jr1
- Doll, Nicolas1
- Gillinov, Marc1
- Holmes, Sari D1
- Keshavarz, Homa1
- Lanuti, Michael1
- Liptay, Michael1
- Loo, Billy W1
- Luketich, James1
- Marshall, M Blair1
- Mazzone, Peter1
- Merritt, Robert E1
- Murthy, Sudish1
- Nitta, Takashi1
- Pennathur, Arjun1
- Pettiford, Brian1
- Rocco, Gaetano1
- Schuchert, Matthew1
- Swanson, Scott J1
- Tong, Betty1
Keyword
- AATS1
- ACCP1
- ADL1
- American College of Chest Physicians1
- BMI1
- CGA1
- Clinical Practice Standards Committee1
- Controlling Nutritional Status1
- CONUT1
- COPD1
- CPET1
- CPSC1
- DLCO1
- ESLD1
- ESTS1
- European Society of Thoracic Surgeons1
- FEV11
- FTR1
- FVC1
- HRCT1
- Mini-Mental State Examination1
- MMSE1
- National Emphysema Treatment Trial1
- NETT1
- NSCLC1
Guidelines
3 Results
- Thoracic: Lung Cancer: 2021 AATS Expert Consensus Document: Definition and Assessment of High Risk in Patients Considered for Lobectomy for Stage I Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer
Definition and assessment of high risk in patients considered for lobectomy for stage I non–small cell lung cancer: The American Association for Thoracic Surgery expert panel consensus document
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryVol. 162Issue 6p1605–1618.e6Published online: July 28, 2021- Arjun Pennathur
- Alessandro Brunelli
- Gerard J. Criner
- Homa Keshavarz
- Peter Mazzone
- Garrett Walsh
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 9Lobectomy is a standard treatment for stage I non–small cell lung cancer, but a significant proportion of patients are considered at high risk for complications, including mortality, after lobectomy and might not be candidates. Identifying who is at risk is important and in evolution. The objective of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Clinical Practice Standards Committee expert panel was to review important considerations and factors in assessing who is at high risk among patients considered for lobectomy. - Acquired: AATS expert consensus guidelines: Atrial fibrillationOpen Archive
Expert consensus guidelines: Examining surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryVol. 153Issue 6p1330–1354.e1Published online: March 3, 2017- Niv Ad
- Ralph J. Damiano Jr.
- Vinay Badhwar
- Hugh Calkins
- Mark La Meir
- Takashi Nitta
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 100The surgical treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) is well established and performed. AF is being treated as a stand-alone procedure or concomitantly with valve, coronary bypass, or other types of cardiac surgical procedures. This document was put together to serve as guidelines and provide recommendations related to the general outcomes associated with surgical ablation, the state of hybrid procedures, the optimal ablation tools available, and the recommendations for the appropriate education and training of surgeons in the field. - Clinical guideline
Statement on matching language to the type of evidence used in describing outcomes data
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryVol. 145Issue 1p5Published in issue: January, 2013- Editors of the HEART Group Journals
Cited in Scopus: 0There are many different types of studies that can be conducted to provide evidence for clinical and outcomes research, including but not limited to retrospective observational analyses, case-control studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Each of these analyses has strengths and limitations, but most importantly, they all result in different types of conclusions about an intervention.