Advertisement
Adult: Aortic Valve: Case Report| Volume 158, ISSUE 2, e25-e27, August 2019

Aortic valve repair with valve-sparing root replacement for asymmetric quadricuspid aortic valve and conversion into symmetric tricuspid valve

Open ArchivePublished:February 21, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.02.035
      Figure thumbnail fx1
      Surgical schema of tricuspidization for asymmetric quadricuspid aortic valve.
      The surgical outcome of tricuspidization for asymmetric quadricuspid aortic valve with valve-sparing root replacement was satisfactory for a young patient.
      See Commentary on page e29.
      Quadricuspid aortic valve (QAV) is a rare congenital cardiac anomaly, with a frequency of 0.006%. In a large series, aortic regurgitation (AR) was found in 26% of the patients with QAV.
      • Tsang M.Y.
      • Abudiab M.M.
      • Ammash N.M.
      • Naqvi T.Z.
      • Edwards W.D.
      • Nkomo V.T.
      • et al.
      Quadricuspid aortic valve: characteristics, associated structural cardiovascular abnormalities, and clinical outcomes.
      Although aortic valve replacement (AVR) is considered to be the standard procedure for QAV, some have reported success with valve repair.
      Valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) is a well-established procedure for the treatment of aortic root aneurysms. Several modifications in the surgical techniques and intraoperative monitoring devices have contributed to significant improvement in the long-term outcomes after this procedure. As a result, the indications for VSRR have expanded to include AR secondary to complex aortic cusp pathologies requiring additional cusp repair. We previously reported a successful case of symmetric QAV repair with VSRR.
      • Yamanaka K.
      • Okada K.
      • Okita Y.
      Aortic root replacement with a valve-sparing technique for quadricuspid aortic valve.
      In this report, we present new insights into asymmetric QAV repair involving (1) the resection of the rudimental commissure, (2) translocation of the cusp deeper into the left ventricular outflow tract, and (3) VSRR for annuloplasty.

      Case

      We present the case of a 58-year-old woman underwent medical screening for chest pain. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed severe AR. Medical therapy was initiated, with no improvement of her symptoms. The left ventricular diastolic diameter had increased to 55 mm, without a decrease in ejection fraction (78%). The regurgitation volume was 61 mL, and the regurgitation fraction was 38%. Transesophageal echocardiography identified the aortic valve as a QAV (Figure 1). The diameter of the annuloventricular junction was 22 mm (index, 12.3 mm/m2), the sinus of Valsalva was 30 mm, and the sinotubular junction was 30 mm, and the body surface area was 1.79 m2. The patient was referred to our department for surgical intervention.
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      Figure 1Preoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Aortic valve consisted of 4 leaflets: 2 unequal small cusps and 2 equal large cusps (Hurwitz F type). NCC, Noncoronary cusp; LCC1, left coronary cusp 1; LCC2, left coronary cusp 2; RCC, right coronary cusp.

      Operative Procedure

      The patient was electively taken to the operating room. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established with ascending aorta and bicaval cannulation. The aortic valve consisted of 4 leaflets: 2 unequal small cusps and 2 equal large cusps, which ware classified as Hurwitz F type. A rudimentary commissure was found in the left coronary cusp (LCC); this separated the LCC into 2 unequal cusps (LCC1 and LCC2; Figure 2, A). The free margin of the rudimentary commissure was thickened and calcified. Similar changes were found in the commissure between LCC1 and the noncoronary cusp. The geometric heights were 20 mm in the right coronary cusp, 21 mm in the noncoronary cusp, 19 mm in LCC1, and 12 mm in LCC2. To make 3 symmetric cusps, the rudimentary commissure was removed and the leaflet enlarged with a 0.6% glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardial patch. The leaflet was then translocated to a lower position in the left ventricular outflow tract (LCC1 + LCC2; Figure 2, B).
      Figure thumbnail gr2
      Figure 2Operative schema. A, A rudimentary commissure was found in the left coronary cusp (LCC) that separated it into 2 unequal cusps (LCC1 and LCC2). B, The rudimentary commissure was removed, and the leaflet was enlarged with a 0.6% glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardial patch translocated to a position lower in the left ventricular outflow tract. C, Aortic root replacement with a valve-sparing preimplantation technique and tricuspidization with central plication and commissural plication. RCC, Right coronary cusp; NCC, noncoronary cusp.
      The aortic root was replaced with a 26-mm Valsalva graft (Terumo Medical, Somerset, NJ) and secured with 12 reinforced 3-0 polyester mattress sutures in the first row and continuous 5-0 polypropylene sutures in the second row. After suturing of the second row, central plication of LCC1 and LCC2 was added, along with commissural plication of LCC2 and the right coronary cusp with autologous pericardium (Figure 2, C).
      Implantation of the coronary arteries and distal anastomoses was completed after confirmation of competency of the aortic valve. Ascending aortic replacement was performed with a 26-mm woven Dacron polyester gelatin implanted graft. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography demonstrated no residual AR. The patient's postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient is doing well 1-year postoperatively without recurrence of AR (Figure 3 and Video 1).
      Figure thumbnail fx2
      Video 1Under cardiac arrest, the replacement of the aortic root was performed with a 26-mm Valsalva graft (Terumo Medical, Somerset, NJ) with 12 reinforced 3-0 polyester mattress sutures in the first row and continuous 5-0 polypropylene sutures in the second row. The rudimentary commissure was detached and enlarged with a 0.6% glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardial patch and translocated to a position lower in the left ventricular outflow tract. After suturing of the second row, central plication and commissural plication with autologous pericardium were added. After confirmation of the competency of the aortic cusp, implantation of the coronary arteries and ascending aorta replacement was completed. Video available at: https://www.jtcvs.org/article/S0022-5223(19)30469-6/fulltext.
      Figure thumbnail fx3
      Figure 3Long-axis view of 1-year follow-up transthoracic echocardiography.

      Discussion

      The application of VSRR in the treatment of severe AR without aortic root dilation remains controversial. In this report, the reimplantation technique had 2 advantages in QAV repair: (1) the ability to realign the commissures symmetrically and at an equal height and (2) narrowing of the annulus to establish a competent aortic valve, which has a greater coaptation height. The preoperative annuloventricular junction index was large relative to the restricted cusp because de Kerchove and colleagues
      • de Kerchove L.
      • Mastrobuoni S.
      • Boodhwani M.
      • Astarci P.
      • Rubay J.
      • Poncelet A.
      • et al.
      The role of annular dimension and annuloplasty in tricuspid aortic valve repair.
      have recommended reimplantation technique whenever the annuloventricular junction is at least 28 mm (index, 13.3 mm/m2). With regard to the surgical approach for tricuspidization, the angles of the 3 fashioned commissures should be considered in concert with the depth and height of the new leaflets relative to the annulus. In this case, annuloplasty with cusp elongation and translocation was effective to obtain good coaptation when the rudimentary cusp was obliterated. These concepts have already been applied in bicuspid valve repair.
      • Gleason T.G.
      Bicuspid aortic valve repair by complete conversion from “raphe'd” (type 1) to “symmetric” (type 0) morphology.
      The greatest concern associated with VSRR is the surgical risk. In experienced institutions, however, the reported in-hospital mortality is low (1.2%).
      • David T.E.
      • David C.M.
      • Feindel C.M.
      • Manlhiot C.
      Reimplantation of the aortic valve at 20 years.
      VSRR may be a reasonable option for the younger patient population for whom avoiding of anticoagulation is preferred.

      Conclusions

      The surgical outcome of asymmetric QAV repair was satisfactory. Reconfiguration of QAV into a symmetric morphology may be a feasible option for younger patients.

      Supplementary Data

      References

        • Tsang M.Y.
        • Abudiab M.M.
        • Ammash N.M.
        • Naqvi T.Z.
        • Edwards W.D.
        • Nkomo V.T.
        • et al.
        Quadricuspid aortic valve: characteristics, associated structural cardiovascular abnormalities, and clinical outcomes.
        Circulation. 2016; 133: 312-319
        • Yamanaka K.
        • Okada K.
        • Okita Y.
        Aortic root replacement with a valve-sparing technique for quadricuspid aortic valve.
        Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015; 47: 741-743
        • de Kerchove L.
        • Mastrobuoni S.
        • Boodhwani M.
        • Astarci P.
        • Rubay J.
        • Poncelet A.
        • et al.
        The role of annular dimension and annuloplasty in tricuspid aortic valve repair.
        Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016; 49 (discussion 437-8): 428-437
        • Gleason T.G.
        Bicuspid aortic valve repair by complete conversion from “raphe'd” (type 1) to “symmetric” (type 0) morphology.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 148 (e1-2): 2862-2868
        • David T.E.
        • David C.M.
        • Feindel C.M.
        • Manlhiot C.
        Reimplantation of the aortic valve at 20 years.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017; 153: 232-238

      Linked Article

      • Commentary: When does aortic valve repair become a root replacement?
        The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryVol. 158Issue 2
        • Preview
          The accompanying article by Ikeno and colleagues1 from Kobe demonstrates the utility of the valve-sparing root procedure in repairing a regurgitant valve, in this case the novelty being the complex quadricuspid valve repair. They describe repair including the excision of the cleft leading to the quadricuspid nature of the valve. They justify root replacement by indexing of the root size to their small patient size. Although they state explicitly that the procedure is indicated by indexing the root diameter to the patient's size, this case brings up the idea of where does root replacement fall in the spectrum of aortic valve repair.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF
        Open Archive