Advertisement
Congenital: Aortic Valve: Letter to the Editor| Volume 157, ISSUE 2, P729, February 2019

Aortic valve neocuspidization: Oversized shoes for children?

      Reply to the Editor:
      Authors have nothing to disclose with regard to commercial support.
      For adult patients, aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo) with glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium is a very attractive option, with neither any limitation in annulus size nor any need for anticoagulation and with favorable midterm results.
      • Ozaki S.
      • Kawase I.
      • Yamashita H.
      • Uchida S.
      • Takatoh M.
      • Kiyohara N.
      Midterm outcomes after aortic valve neocuspidization with glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium.
      These features are enough to draw the attention of pediatric cardiac surgeons as well. In their letter, Kalfa and colleagues
      • Kalfa D.
      • LaPar D.
      • Chai P.
      • Bacha E.
      Aortic valve neocuspidization: a bright future in pediatric aortic valve surgery?.
      mentioned their preliminary pediatric AVNeo cases, which had been performed on children for whom the Ross procedure was unsuitable.
      Growth, however, poses a big hurdle in pediatric cardiac surgery. The fundamental question is “What is the optimal size?” The generous size of AVNeo neocusps seems suitable for growing children, but an increase in size of the aortic annulus and the sinotubular junction would probably affect function and durability of the leaflet, assuming that neocusps would not grow. One would easily imagine that the greater the size change in aortic root, the more likely the chances of leaflet failure. A finite study regarding aortic root size change may help to predict future behavior of neocusps.
      On the other hand, the use of the autologous pericardium for neocusps in children raises concerns of durability. Thin, easily calcifying leaflets in a rapidly beating, growing heart may yield different outcomes from those seen in adult patients. “Off-the-shelf” materials could be used, especially in patients with no available pericardium because of previous surgery or pericardial pathology. A proper material remains yet to be identified.
      Despite substantial concerns, in children with otherwise untreatable pathology, AVNeo would be a valuable option. Giving to a child the chance of growing up until the inevitable next surgery is of priceless value. We are looking forward to seeing the pediatric AVNeo results of Kalfa and colleagues.
      • Kalfa D.
      • LaPar D.
      • Chai P.
      • Bacha E.
      Aortic valve neocuspidization: a bright future in pediatric aortic valve surgery?.

      References

        • Ozaki S.
        • Kawase I.
        • Yamashita H.
        • Uchida S.
        • Takatoh M.
        • Kiyohara N.
        Midterm outcomes after aortic valve neocuspidization with glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018; 155: 2379-2387
        • Kalfa D.
        • LaPar D.
        • Chai P.
        • Bacha E.
        Aortic valve neocuspidization: a bright future in pediatric aortic valve surgery?.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019; 157: 728

      Linked Article

      • Aortic valve neocuspidization: A bright future in pediatric aortic valve surgery?
        The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeryVol. 157Issue 2
        • Preview
          We congratulate Ozaki and colleagues1 on their study evaluating midterm results after aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo) with glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardium. In their cohort of 850 adult patients with various aortic valve diseases who underwent an aortic valve replacement during a period of 8 years, excellent results were reported in terms of actuarial freedom from death, cumulative incidence of reoperation, and recurrent moderate or greater aortic regurgitation.1
        • Full-Text
        • PDF
        Open Archive