If you don't remember your password, you can reset it by entering your email address and clicking the Reset Password button. You will then receive an email that contains a secure link for resetting your password
If the address matches a valid account an email will be sent to __email__ with instructions for resetting your password
Cardiac Surgery Department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, FranceUniversité Paris Descartes, Paris Cité Sorbonne, Paris, France
Internal Medicine Department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, FranceUniversité Paris Descartes, Paris Cité Sorbonne, Paris, France
Address for reprints: Brigitte Ranque, MD, PhD, Internal Medicine Department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, 20 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France.
Internal Medicine Department, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, FranceUniversité Paris Descartes, Paris Cité Sorbonne, Paris, France
Various complications have been reported but remain uncommon. Most of them occur in the first days after implantation. We report here late aortic and left atrial perforation by occluder struts, complicated by acute cardiac tamponade, 28 months after device implantation. Our report illustrates the possibility of late life-threatening complications of percutaneous atrial devices.
Clinical Summary
A 22-year-old woman was seen for acute chest pain. She had been treated with prednisone (8 mg daily) for a anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody rheumatoid arthritis since the age of 17 years, with the recent addition of oral methotrexate (15 mg weekly). She also had a history of secundum atrial septal defect of 11 mm successfully treated 28 months previously by percutaneous closure with a 20-mm CARDIA occluder (Atriasept ASD; Cardia, Eagan, Minn), a double-umbrella device with left- and right-sided struts (arms).
At her admission, the patient was afebrile and in hemodynamically stable condition. There was isolated jugular venous distention. Her electrocardiogram showed a 120 beats/min sinus tachycardia, and laboratory findings revealed anemia (hemoglobin 10.9 g/dL). Chest radiography appeared normal; however, echocardiography demonstrated a pericardial effusion of 28 mm width with evidence of right ventricular compression. Subxiphoid pericardial drainage removed 150 mL of bloody pericardial fluid under pressure. Pericardial fluid culture results were negative, and a pericardial biopsy sample was unremarkable. Immediate outcome was favorable, and a diagnosis of viral or connective tissue–related pericarditis was considered. The patient was given oral colchicine (1 mg daily). Persistent tachycardia (120 beats/min), however, prompted us to check the functionality of the atrial device. Cardiac computed tomographic scan suggested the protrusion of a device's strut through the right atrial wall and the aorta, which was confirmed by transesophageal echocardiography.
The patient was rapidly taken for surgery. One of the occluder's struts was indeed perforating the aortic root, and another was perforating the lateral wall of the right atrium (Figure 1). The occluder was removed, and the atrial septal defect was closed with a heterologous pericardium patch. Perforations of the aorta and right atrium were fixed with cross stitches. Postoperative outcome was uneventful, and after 6 months of follow-up, the patient remained free of symptoms.
Figure 1Operative findings. A, Intraoperative photograph shows perforation of the right atrium by an occluder strut (arrow). B, Intraoperative photograph shows atrial septal occluder in situ, before removal (visualized through the opened right atrium). C, The removed device can be seen clearly in this photograph.
Closure of atrial septal defects with various percutaneous devices has been increasingly used during the last 30 years as an alternative to conventional open surgical repair because of the ease and the relative safety of the procedure.
Various complications, including device migration, thromboembolism, significant residual shunt, arrhythmia, aortic or atrial perforations, and device erosion, have been reported but remain uncommon. Most complications (70%) occur within the first 3 days after implantation.
Surgery for complications of trans-catheter closure of atrial septal defects: a multi-institutional study from the European Congenital Heart Surgeons Association.
Our patient had been treated with prednisone for a few years; however, this therapy is unlikely to have played an important role in the complication because of the low daily dose administered. Furthermore, there is no evidence of a higher incidence of percutaneous device complications among patients receiving corticosteroids. Nevertheless, corticosteroids are known to alter tissues healing and may have helped to worsen the injury provoked by the device.
We report here late aortic and left atrial perforation by occluder struts, complicated by acute cardiac tamponade, occurring 28 months after the implantation of a double-umbrella occluding device. Our report illustrates the possibility of life-threatening complications of percutaneous atrial devices even several years after the closure. Prolonged caution is therefore warranted for patients in whom atrial septal defects have been treated with a transcatheter occlusion device.
References
Berdat P.A.
Chatterjee T.
Pfammatter J.P.
Windecker S.
Meier B.
Carrel T.
Surgical management of complications after transcatheter closure of fore an atrial septal defect or patent foramen ovale.
Surgery for complications of trans-catheter closure of atrial septal defects: a multi-institutional study from the European Congenital Heart Surgeons Association.